The Pyrotechnic Pen

Provocative, insightful advocate for children, the elderly, animals, the environment and all who cannot speak for themselves; a must read for conservatives and liberals alike!

My Photo
Name:
Location: United States

Enjoy throwing kisses to the world, hugging trees, petting my dog, cuddling up with a good book to read, loving all of God's creatures great and small, writing poetry, the romance of fireflies dancing in the fields and forests, hiking, camping, fishing, sailing, scuba diving, waterfalls, the ocean, and the company of good people who are working to make the world a better place for the children of the future.

Thursday, June 24, 2010

How to win the war on terrorism and get even with Rolling Stone

When are presidents going to learn to leave fighting wars to the generals? And when are generals going to learn to not insult or disrespect their Commander in Chief? The resignation of General Stanley McChrysta benefits only our enemies, the Taliban and al-Qaida, and is NOT good for America.

I think it was very foolish for a general to permit a reporter from Rolling Stone magazine to travel around with him and his staff and have access to private discussions and conversations. Any one who knows anything about Rolling Stone magazine and is a general would not let one of their unethical gossip monger, fame, fortune and glory seeking tabloid journalist any where within a 100 miles of a general, especially not in the middle of war!

I believe in freedom of the press, but war is hell and you have to have secrets. Often it is secrets that win wars. You don't broadcasts your movements. You don't let the enemy know what is on the minds of the generals who plan and implement strategy. And you certainly don't allow unethical reporters free access to top commanders in the mists of a war, for risk they will publish information that would be useful to the enemy.

If I were President Obama I'd issue an executive order prohibiting press access to high command and officers in the field. This is not as issue of freedom of press; it is an issue of security. One aspect of security relates to discipline of forces and obeying orders from the President on down the chain of command to the lowest man on the totem poll out there digging fox holes, hiding behind rocks, fighting for their life! When permitting access to commanders at any level jeopardizes the security of forces on the ground, then you must fix the problem by kicking the press out!

War is hell and sometimes it simply is very foolish and unwise to let the press have free access to commanders in the field. But you know what, I believe General Stanley McChrysta knew this all along. I believe he wanted to create a situation where he would have to resign because I believe he wants to go into politics. I'd not be surprised if he runs for office in the next election or on down the road!

As an Army brat I grew up listing to my father talk about General Dogulas MacArthur, who he served under in WWII and the campaign to retake the Philippines. My father won two Bronze Stars in combat in the Pacific and later also served under MacArther during the Korean War. He was a leader of men and believed that Harry S. Truman was way out of line in 1951, that he should have left the fighting of the war to General McArthur, who is most remembered perhaps for his eloquent statement that, "Old soldier never die, they just fade away." My Dad would often preach how Truman was gutless, with such evocative expressions as, "To hell with the communist forces! We should have let MacArthur blow them to hell if that's what it came down to! It would have been best for everyone!"

Maybe my father was right. One thing is for certain, where there is a widely published conflict between the Commander in Chief and any of his generals during a time of war, it benefits only our enemies. That is why in this modern age of instant communication, where it is especially difficult to control communications, it is vital, a matter of life and death, that a free press NOT be permitted access to command and control officers, their staff, or anywhere near a headquarters or field operations command unit. To do so risks everything from leaking of critical classified information to the such ridiculous situations as that of a Rolling Stone tabloid journalist publishing private statements that would cause the resignation of a very fine general.

If I were General Stanley McChrysta I'd sue Rolling Stone magazine and put them out of business. I've never liked that magazine anyway, as they were greatly responsible for popularizing the drug culture in America which misguided many young people and caused them to be hurt and harmed, their lives destroyed, by blowing away their minds on everything from alcohol and marijuana to LSD and psilocybin magic mushrooms! I would not be unhappy to see Rolling Stone magazine get hit with a law suit by General McChrysta, especially if President Obama joined in the claim!

Whatever happens, my thoughts and prayers are with the men and women of our fighting forces in Afghanistan, Iraq and around the world. God bless America! Keep us free and bring our soldiers home safely ... leaving not an opium poppy standing, nor a Taliban to profit upon the opiates derived from their latex sap. The terrorists in Afghanistan, you see, are funded by the opium poppy, and the war on terrorism could be won quite easily by total eradication of opium poppies! Now I may not be a general, but I'm certain about that! So if you're listening President Obama, and want to win this war, wage it against the poppy and get even with Rolling Stone while you're at it!

Thursday, June 03, 2010

Boycott BP: Drillingf for oil is risky business but BP should take full responsibility

Boycott BP: Drilling for oil is risky business but BP should take full responsibility




The explosion of the Deepwater Horizon which killed 11 people and has resulted in the biggest oil spill in US history should have taught us that drilling for oil is risky business. This is not child’s play, but a deadly game. The risks increase with off shore drilling operations; the deeper beneath the surface one drills, the greater are the perils as has been clearly demonstrated by the sinking of Deepwater
Horizon.

Indeed, the name Deepwater Horizon has now taken upon a whole other meaning, one that is ominous in nature rather than symbolic of exploring new horizons. Just like the Titanic struck an iceberg and sank upon its maiden voyage, the Deepwater Horizon has exploded, sank into the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, and has now polluted the pristine gulf waters, threatening to destroy the lives of fishermen, those who depend upon the associated tourist industry, and to further destroy the beaches, wetlands and wildlife of the Gulf Coast ecosystem.

How should we respond to this ecological disaster? How should money granted to the various states by BP be used? What can we each do to lessen the hurt and harm done by this catastrophe? Should we just pout and blame Obama, trying to turn the BP oil spill into Obama’s Katrina? Or should we look for ways that we can each help those who have been hurt and harmed the most by this tragedy?

I suggest that after praying for the victims of the oil spill and their families, that we each try to help in whatever way we can. I personally think everyone should boycott BP, cut up their BP gas credit cards, and use alternative sources of
gas and energy where possible. This should include using the money granted to the various states to invest in clean, renewable sources of energy, like wind generated power and solar power. We should not waste this money on trying to advertise to get people to come to Mississippi at a time when oil threatens the gulf coast. Rather, we should invest that money wisely to promote small businesses in Mississippi which foster alternative sources of energy. Also the funds might be spent to support the rescue of wildlife, fisheries, and other projects that will help in the recovery of the hurt, harm and damage done by the oil spill to marine animals, birds and other wildlife.

Yes, drilling for oil a mile beneath the ocean’s surface is risky business, as is coal mining deep within the earth’s surface. There are great risks associated with any large operation such as building a damn to harness hydroelectric power or maintaining an electric power grid to supply power to homes and businesses everywhere. The fact that there is risk associated with any given utility provider or large industrial operation does not mean we should stop
developing our natural resources. But it does mean we should learn from our mistakes, value life as most precious, and not cut corners. It also means taking responsibility for our actions!

BP has indicated they wish to pass blame to others, to be responsible only for clean up, and not all other associated damages with respect to the megalithic oil spill. That is where I take issue with BP. I think BP should be held accountable for all damaged, for all hurt and harm associated with the oil spill. The $25-million dollar grants to various Gulf Coast states, though a large sum of money, does not even begin to compensate for the loss many people are suffering. The fishing industry and the tourist industry are billion dollar industries and it may take generations to recover from the BP oil spill. Thus $25-million dollars is a drop in the bucket, a mere bribe to politicians and the various states to move forward with fossil fuel power production rather than invest in clean,
renewable energy development. Why it was only days after receiving this grant that the Kemper County coal burning power plant, which had been put on hold given Mississippi Power agree to restrictions, was permitted! I smell a rat!

We should learn our lesson and stop giving in to the big oil and big utility companies! We need more restrictions, more safety, more responsibility, not less! Therefore I feel a boycott of BP is warranted. Plus every state effected by
the BP oil spill should seek the maximum amount of money they can from BP. Louisiana is already asking BP for some $325-million. Mississippi, Alabama and Florida should do the same. But I believe each state should be asking for at
least a billion dollars because it is going to take that much just to begin to recover from all the mess, goo and pollution this oil spill has already cost.

I would not put it past BP to change their name to something like “AmeriOil” after this mess, that they can try to disassociate themselves with the biggest oil spill in US history. After the Exxon Valdez oil spill, the oil tanker was renamed so that it would not be associated with that largest of oil spills. We should not let BP get away with the hurt, harm and injury they have done to people, to wildlife, and to the ecology by the massive oil spill which threatens to tarnish and darken what is a wonderful region, that jewel and treasure which is the Gulf Coast of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida! All who live or visit this great natural resource fall in love with the sea, the white sand beaches and the relaxed lifestyle. To think that that may all be lost by the irresponsibility of BP to accept ALL THE BLAME for this ecological disaster is simply NOT ACCEPTABLE!